Computer Networking Reserach Laboratory

Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Colorado State Univeristy

Efficient Representation, Measurement, and Recovery of Large-Scale Networks

Introduction
Rapid growth in networks is leading to a colossal amount of connections and data underneath.

Analysis of network measurements and structures in terms of distances, network features, etc., helps extract patterns that are not in general noticed by humans. Ideally, one should have complete set of measurements associated with a network for unbiased results. However, computational, communication, and storage limitations do not allow that.

Thus, a network is often sampled for its nodes or substructures in order to facilitate analysis. While extensive sampling can be computationally expensive for analysis or even unviable due to access restrictions, privacy issues, etc., sparse or locally targeted sampling techniques do not allow recovery of the complete information for the original network while missing facts may lead to altered network characteristics and biased research results.

Our network recovery techniques accurately predict missing data with low error values while preserving original network characteristics. We also developed ways to represent and store networks in coherent yet compressed fashion that preserve the original network characteristics for uncompromised network experiments.

This research is applicable to general graphs and data that can be represented as graphs, is scalable, and help bridge the gap between network sampling and meaningful research deductions for real-world networks.

We are currently working on:
  • Network recovery from partial measurements
  • Compact lossless representation of graphs
  • Efficient sampling techniques for large datasets
Collabarative team
  • Dr. Kelum Gajamannage
  • Dr. Randy Paffenroth
Datasets
Publications
  1. A. P. Jayasumana, R. Paffenroth, G. Mahindre, S. Ramasamy, and K. Gajamannage,“Network Topology Mapping from Partial Virtual Coordinates and Graph Geodesics,” To appear in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.
  2. G. S. Mahindre, and A. P. Jayasumana, “Link Dimension and Exact Construction of a Graph,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05916, 2019.
  3. A. P. Jayasumana, R. Paffenroth, G. Mahindre, S. Ramasamy, and K. Gajamannage, “Network Topology Mapping from Partial Virtual Coordinates and Graph Geodesics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.03319, 2018.
  4. G. S. Mahindre, and A. P. Jayasumana, “Efficient Representation, Measurement, and Recovery of Large-scale Networks,” Ninth International Green and Sustainable Computing Conference (IGSC). IEEE, 2018.
  5. G. S. Mahindre, and A. P. Jayasumana, “Post failure recovery of virtual coordinates in wireless sensor networks,” 7th International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability. IEEE, 2014.
  6. D. C. Dhanapala and A. P. Jayasumana, “Topology preserving maps: extracting layout maps of wireless sensor networks from virtual coordinates,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON). 2014 Jun 1;22(3):784-97.
  7. D. C. Dhanapala and A. P. Jayasumana, “Directional virtual coordinate systems for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 2011.
  8. D. C. Dhanapala and A. P. Jayasumana, “Dimension reduction of virtual coordinate systems in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010. IEEE, 2010.
  9. D. C. Dhanapala and A. P. Jayasumana, “Topology preserving maps from virtual coordinates for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Local Computer Network Conference. IEEE, 2010.

Feel free to contact us if you have any questions about our research and findings. We also welcome your feedback.

© 2019 CNRL. All Rights Reserved